#UrbanChat: ‘What Makes You Comfortable?’ Here’s What You Said…
Wednesday was a huge day for us at Urban Times… We “went .CO” and moved to urbantimes.co, we rolled out our new community comment section and we hosted our first ever tweet chat: #UrbanChat. We teamed up with Philips’ Livable Cities and BMW Guggenheim Lab to talk about what makes us all comfortable in cities and the response was better than we could ever have imagined!
Amongst our brilliant participants was the director at the Philips Center for Health and Well-Being, Koen Joose, who joined the chat to input his expert opinion on comfort for the ageing population in cities. With over 730 tweets posted at the time we had a “potential reach” of over 2 million people at the peak time – we would like to thank everyone for joining in and making it a brilliantly informative and fun evening.
Q1. What do you think are the most important livability indicators in cities? What makes them so important?
#UrbanChat kicked off around liveability indicators in cities which listed plenty of crucial urban comfort factors to formulate ideas for the rest of the tweet chat. Moving away from heavy benchmarks such as GDP became immediately necessary and the tweet chat filled with support for walkability (and replacing car use) as the main priority. Wesley Stockton had a brilliant reasoning for this:
A1 For me, livability = walkability. The more time I spend in a car, the less time I’m engaging with the city and the community #urbanchat
— Wesley Stockton (@patheticliform) September 19, 2012
Additional responses flooding in: access to green space, access to culture, access to knowledge and skill pools, access to services, access to transport, social inclusiveness / community-driven indicators, affordability and the act of actually defining “liveable”.
Koen managed to sum some of these up very concisely:
A1: For aging people most critical is staying engaged with community. Solutions are in infrastructure, culture, policies etc #UrbanChat
— Koen Joosse (@KoenJoosse) September 19, 2012
And Greg Hanscom came up with the most outside-of-the-box thinking here:
A1 I also think access to fresh, local foods is huge — both for quality of life and for public health. #urbanchat
— Greg Hanscom (@ghanscom) September 19, 2012
Q2. Which would make your city more comfortable: More green space/sustainable measures or greater economic opportunities? Why?
The responses for this seemed in strong agreement with the idea that, when it comes to a green vs. economy trade-off, there is no one without the other. It also became apparent that the two need not be mutually exclusive but instead combined to create the best of both worlds:
RT @rethinkurban: @theurbantimes A2) I think we need to get away from saying it’s economics OR sustainable space. Need sustainable local …
— Philips (@LivableCities) September 19, 2012
The debate then developed into strong congruence around the idea that green space and sustainability is an economic driver, something that builds value in real estate and more cost-effective living solutions:
I think greenspace = economic value.We have to understand the value of beautiful, liveable, and viable cities #urbanchat
— UT Built Environment (@UT_BuiltEnv) September 19, 2012
Q3. Does the urban design, visual appeal and condition of your city accommodate comfortable living? How could it be improved?
Urban design is critical to comfort in cities. It is a core experience driver for the city, forms the atmosphere of the area and can be the hurdle or aid to make the city more cohesive as a whole. A problem arises with the status of the urban space, is it public? is it private? is it the hazy in-between? This can cause confusion with the discomfort of not knowing if you are welcome in an area of the city. Removing the obstacles for mobility promotes a better used city. The more adaptive and smart the city design is, the more comfortable it will be for all generations.
@koenjoosse Smart, common sense & functional accessibility, not dictatorial, blanket, one-size-fits-all, accessibility #UrbanChat #AgingWell
— Jonathan Brown (@mondo_tiki_man) September 19, 2012
RT @grinyertyler: A3 Good Urban Design that promotes interaction between pedestrians and built form can transform a City into a livable…
— The Philips Center (@PhilipsCenter) September 19, 2012
Q4. Fast, safe, clean, accessible, cheap: what is the main comfort factor for your work commute? Does your city accommodate this?
The results were mixed on this question as a person’s commute is very personal to them however the overarching desire to get to work quickly and efficiently is a deciding factor in one’s choice. If the transport infrastructure is not adequate in producing timely and accessible routes to work a person is far more likely to use their car above any other method.
A4 Travel time = my commute comfort factor. I decided to live 1km from work so that I can walk! #urbanchat @bmwgugglab
— Rachel Smith (@CyclingRSmith) September 19, 2012
It then becomes important to have a comfortable and engaging experience on one’s journey – whether it is the clean air (and cheap and cheerful) feeling of a bike ride or a scenic walk.
Q5. City comfort becomes more critical with age. Which cities recognise this and how do they improve the comfort of the elderly?
Cities have the ability to make distances “smaller” by providing much closer access to vital amenities and services, which is a key concern for the ageing population.
A5 Cities with a variety of amenities within walking distance can assist with aging urban populations in Cities. #mixeduse #urbanchat
— Tyler Grinyer (@GrinyerTyler) September 19, 2012
It is also important to reduce the stigma around the elderly especially in cities that are forging a ‘hip’ and ‘youthful’ culture. The ageing population is often marginalised and finding a solution to bringing the two ends of the demographic spectrum together is likely to improve the comfort and inclusiveness of the ageing into the city community. Mark Minkjan tweeted a brilliant example of where this has been made possible:
@livablecities A5 I think northern European cities can learn from our Mediterranean friends there. More family/community care #urbanchat
— Mark Minkjan (@markminkjan) September 19, 2012
Lest we forget the simple things too:
@bmwgugglab A5. Working on @vantransp2040 mobility needs of elderly emerged as key issue. Safety, places to sit, walkability#urbanchat
— neal lamontagne (@nlamontagne) September 19, 2012
Q6. Lighting is crucial for safer environments. Does your city commit to this and what else is necessary for security comfort?
A6. Lighting is a very underrated in urban design. Key to pedestrian safety & comfort. Also opportunity for beauty & whimsy. #urbanchat
— neal lamontagne (@nlamontagne) September 19, 2012
Although the question of what to do about light pollution was left unanswered, lighting clearly has a definitive link to safety on city streets the world over and is unquestionably makes a significant impact on how comfortable life is in the night hours. The provision of lighting across a city can be disparate and can make certain enclaves in a city into hotbeds of criminal activity and discomfort. What else can be done beyond lighting to improve comfort through safer environments? Here are some excellent answers (Jane Jacobs’ words live on!):
A6 Main areas do but more residential areas lack lighting. I think people should be taught how to be safe in an urban environment #urbanchat
— Fay Schofield (@fayscho) September 19, 2012
A6. Besides lighting, a strong sense of safety in the community or neighborhood may impact strongly on perception of fear. #urbanchat
— MIT CoLab (@MITCoLab) September 19, 2012
A6 Lighting improves safety.But also development that creates an “Eyes on the Street” approach. Originally quoted by Jane Jacobs #urbanchat
— Tyler Grinyer (@GrinyerTyler) September 19, 2012
A6 Lighting is crucial for safety, but let’s not forget Jane Jacobs! People make places safe. How can spaces attract more people? #urbanchat
— Wesley Stockton (@patheticliform) September 19, 2012
A6. Lighting provides access to public spaces. But also other obstacles must be removed, e.g. flat pavements, safe crossings #UrbanChat
— Koen Joosse (@KoenJoosse) September 19, 2012
Q7. In one or two words, which element of your city makes you most comfortable? (Name the city and as many elements as you want!)
For the final question we wanted to leave it open, fun and light and a chance to tell us what made your own city comfortable for you personally. Here are some of our favourite answers:
A7. in #Vancouver, family-friendly amenities close by: Ice rinks, pools, playgrounds, and private kids arts or sports programs.#urbanchat
— Wendy Waters (@wendy_waters) September 19, 2012
A7 Manhattan KS: Narrow Gridded streets, Trees, Students walking and biking everywhere, Centralized City Park #urbanchat
— Mitchel Loring (@MLLoring) September 19, 2012
A7 The People! My favorite in Denver is going for a run or a bike ride and the people I pass smile and love the city as much as I #urbanchat
— Wesley Stockton (@patheticliform) September 19, 2012
A7. Living in Stockholm for 6 months and definitely for me high quality public facilities appreciated by people (no vandalism) #UrbanChat
— Koen Joosse (@KoenJoosse) September 19, 2012
A7 #London – accessible transport at all hours of the day/night. This provides me with a feeling of safety #urbanchat
— Fay Schofield (@fayscho) September 19, 2012
We will be hosting another #UrbanChat again soon so be sure to follow us on twitter to receive updates on when and what the next one will comprise of: @theurbantimes. Thanks again to everyone that turned up this time!



Responses to #UrbanChat: ‘What Makes You Comfortable?’ Here’s What You Said…
0 People EngagedNo Sites Currently Linking Back